Skip to content

AIRS Analyzer

The AIRS (AI Results) Analyzer lets you see how any query is answered across multiple AI platforms—from Google’s AI Overviews to ChatGPT, AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, and more. Understand where your brand appears and what sources AI tools are citing. For the strategic view of AI visibility monitoring, see AI Visibility and Competitors.

  • How to run an AIRS analysis
  • Reading the Brand & Entity Landscape
  • Understanding the comparison matrix
  • Tracking brand mentions and citations
  • Reading strategic insights
  • Analyzing individual tool responses
  • Managing past reports
  • Exporting your findings

AIRS answers critical questions:

  • Does your brand appear in AI-generated answers?
  • Which sources are AI engines citing?
  • How do AI answers compare to traditional SERPs?
  • Where should you focus content efforts?
  1. Navigate to AIRS Analyzer from the Toolbox
  2. Enter your search query (e.g., “best project management software”)
  3. Optionally select:
    • Language — Target language for results
    • Country — Geographic location the query is run from
    • Brand — Select a brand to track mentions and citations of it throughout the report
  4. Click Analyze to start

The analyzer runs through multiple stages:

StageDescription
1. Fetching AnswersQueries all AI search tools simultaneously
2. Analyzing ResponsesProcesses each tool’s response
3. Comparing ResultsCross-references sources and citations
4. Generating InsightsCreates strategic recommendations

A full analysis usually takes several minutes, and complex queries can run 15 minutes or longer. Every AI engine is queried live before the analysis stages can begin, and the AI search platforms have been making their answers progressively harder to fetch, so those requests take longer than they used to.

You do not have to sit and watch it:

  • Leave the page or refresh — the analysis keeps running, and returning to the AIRS Analyzer picks the progress display back up where it left off.
  • We email you when the report is ready, so you can start one and come back later.
  • Start another report while one is running — the first keeps processing in the background and appears in Past Reports when it finishes.

Every report opens on three views. Switch between them at the top of the report:

ViewWhat it holds
Strategic ReportStrategic Summary, Brand & Entity Landscape, and Content Blueprints
Source ComparisonWhich domains and URLs the engines cite, and how they overlap
Tool ResultsEach engine’s full answer, its scores, and the entities it named

  • Overall AI Visibility — How often your brand/domain appears
  • Key Findings — Most important takeaways
  • Opportunities — Where you could improve visibility
  • Threats — Competitive concerns to address

Every entity the AI engines named in their answers, ranked by how many engines named it, with stance, sentiment and evidence quotes. Your selected brand is marked and pinned to the top of the section with its own coverage line. Full breakdown in Brand & Entity Landscape.

A publishable brief per content opportunity: title, content goal, reader outcome, the role your brand plays in the piece, a full outline with H2 sections and their H3 subsections, the unique angle, key differentiators and the optimization strategy.


Three things sit on this view.

The URLs the AI engines cite most, ranked by how many distinct engines cite each one, with those engines named. Google and Bing organic results are excluded from this count. This table is about being quoted, not about ranking. Your own URLs are flagged with a You badge.

Observed patterns in what the engines cite, each one written as three lines: the pattern, what it implies for your strategy, and the action to take. Each pattern lists the engines whose answers support it, so nothing here is an assertion you cannot trace back.

Visibility across all platforms:

ColumnWhat It Shows
Google SERPsTraditional organic rankings
Bing SERPsBing organic search positions
AI ModeGoogle’s AI Mode responses
AIOGoogle’s AI Overview citations
Bing CopilotMicrosoft’s AI assistant
Claude WebAnthropic’s Claude with web search
GeminiGoogle’s Gemini with grounding
GrokxAI’s Grok with web search
OpenAI WebOpenAI’s web search integration
PerplexityPerplexity AI citations
ChatGPTChatGPT search results
  • checkmark = Source appears in this tool
  • Empty = Source not cited
  • AI Citations = How many AI engines cite that source, shown as a count in the first column
  • You badge = the source is on your brand’s domain

AI citations and organic search presence are counted separately and never merged. A page that ranks on both Google and Bing but is quoted by no AI engine has an AI Citations count of zero, which is the point. The table sorts by AI Citations (highest first) by default. Click any column heading to sort by that platform instead.

The Show sources cited by 3+ AI engines filter narrows the table to sources that more than one or two engines agree on.

Deep-dive into individual engine responses:

  • Full AI-generated text for each engine, with your brand mentions highlighted
  • Tool performance matrix scoring each engine on depth, accuracy, intent match, and source quality
  • Brand Mentions panel showing whether each engine named or cited you
  • Response entities — a sortable table of every entity that engine named in its answer, with mention counts and stance
  • Cited sources with links
  • Error states if any engines failed

The Brand & Entity Landscape answers one question: when AI engines answer this query, who do they actually talk about?

Floyi reads each engine’s answer, extracts every entity it names, then rolls those up into a single table across all responding engines.

If you ran the analysis with a brand selected, the section opens with your brand: whether it was mentioned in the answers, in how many of the responding AI engines, and separately how many cited a page on your domain. Coverage is always stated against responding AI engines, meaning engines that returned a usable answer. Failed engines and the two SERPs are not in the denominator, so an outage cannot make your coverage look worse than it is.

ColumnWhat it shows
EntityThe canonical name, with a Your Brand tag on your own
TypeService provider, commercial brand, person, product or service, organization, directory or publisher, government, location
AI enginesHow many of the responding engines named it
Total mentionsMentions summed across every answer
Primary stanceRecommended, conditionally recommended, compared, mentioned, cited as authority, or criticized or discouraged
SentimentPositive, neutral, negative, mixed or unknown

Sort by any column. Filter by entity type or by primary stance. Ten entities show by default, and View all expands the rest inline.

Expand any row to see the case behind it: how many engines recommended it, the order it first appeared in, average sentiment confidence, any aliases the answers used, and one card per engine carrying that engine’s stance, sentiment, mention count and a quote from its answer.

Stance and sentiment are separate on purpose. An engine can name you in a neutral tone while recommending a competitor, and repetition is never treated as proof of quality.


When you run an analysis with a brand selected, AIRS tracks two separate signals for every engine. They sound similar but mean very different things:

SignalWhat it means
NamedThe engine wrote your brand name (or an alias, or your domain) into the answer itself
CitedThe engine used a page on your domain as a source, without necessarily naming you

An engine can cite your page as a source and still credit the answer to someone else. That is a very different problem from not being in the answer at all, so AIRS never merges the two.

  • Selected brand card — at the top of the Brand & Entity Landscape: mentioned in X of Y responding AI engines, with citations stated separately underneath.
  • Brand column — in the tool performance matrix on Tool Results, next to Overall. A filled badge means Named (with the mention count), an outlined badge means Cited only, and a dash means neither. Sort by it to see which engines know you.
  • Report summary — a single line above the matrix: named in X of Y answers, cited by Z.
  • Brand Mentions panel — for each engine, the mention count, citation count, which terms matched (brand name, aliases, or domain), and a quote showing the first mention in context.
  • Highlighted responses — mentions are highlighted directly inside the AI answer so you can scan a long response and find them instantly. Use the Highlight in response checkbox to turn it off.
  • Entity table — your brand is tagged Your Brand and shown alongside every other entity the engines named, so you can read your position relative to competitors instead of in isolation.
  • Source Comparison table — rows on your own domain are marked with a You badge, so you can see at a glance which of your URLs the engines are pulling from.
  • The mention count reflects your brand in the answer text only. Sources are counted separately as citations, so a page title that happens to contain your name never inflates the mention count.
  • Coverage is stated against responding AI engines, meaning the engines that returned a usable answer for this query. Engines that failed, engines disabled at the time of the run, and the two SERPs are excluded from the denominator.
  • Matching covers your brand name, any aliases set in Topical Authority settings, and your domain (including variations like www. and the bare domain name). This is the same matching Topical Authority uses, so the two tools agree on whether you were mentioned.

AIRS provides actionable recommendations:

  • High Visibility — Appearing in 7+ tools
  • Medium Visibility — Appearing in 4-6 tools
  • Low Visibility — Appearing in 1-3 tools
  • Not Visible — Not cited anywhere

The analyzer identifies:

  • Topics where competitors appear but you don’t
  • Platforms where you’re underrepresented
  • Content gaps to fill for better AI visibility

Access your analysis history:

  • Search by query or date
  • View previously analyzed topics
  • Reload any past report
  • Load — Restore a previous analysis to view
  • Delete — Remove reports you no longer need
  • Bulk Delete — Select multiple reports to delete

Reports are paginated. Click Load More to view additional history.


If results seem outdated or you want fresh analysis:

  1. Click Regenerate on the report, which shows its credit cost on the button
  2. Confirm in the Confirm Regenerate Strategy dialog
  3. The system re-analyzes the saved AI responses and generates new insights

Regenerating is also how you add the Brand & Entity Landscape to an older report. Floyi extracts the entities from the answers already stored with that report, so no engine is queried again.

If any AI tools failed during initial analysis:

  1. Click Retry Failed Tools
  2. Only failed tools are re-queried
  3. Results are merged with existing data

Click the Export button on the report:

FormatBest For
DOCXWord documents, editing, white-labelling
PDFSharing, presentations
HTMLSelf-contained file for the web or email
Google DocsCollaborating with your team

The Source Comparison table exports separately as XLSX, CSV, or straight to Google Sheets, using its own Export button.

Exports include:

  • Strategic summary and insights
  • Brand & Entity Landscape — the selected brand card and the full entity table with engine counts, mentions, stance and sentiment
  • Content blueprints, with H2 sections and their H3 subsections
  • Keyword & Query Signals — each keyword with the number of responding engines that used it
  • Source Comparison — top domains, most-cited URLs, and the citation patterns with their recommended actions
  • Tool performance matrix, including the Brand column
  • Brand mention and citation status for each engine, with mention context
  • Individual tool responses, with links, tables, and formatting preserved
  • Source citations

The Source Comparison spreadsheet exports carry an AI Citation Engines column and an Organic Search Engines column, plus a Your Brand column marking rows on your own domain.


AIRS queries: Google SERPs, Bing SERPs, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overview, Bing Copilot, Claude Web Search, Gemini Grounding, Grok, OpenAI Web Search, Perplexity, and ChatGPT.

Some AI tools may not return results for certain queries, or may experience temporary outages. Failed tools are marked and can be retried.

If a provider has an extended outage, we temporarily disable that engine so you are not charged for runs that cannot succeed. Disabled engines are hidden from new reports, while past reports keep the data they already collected.

Additionally, some AI search providers have geographic restrictions. For example, AI Mode and AI Overview are not available in Russia or Belarus, and ChatGPT has limited availability in certain regions. See Supported Countries & Regions for the full list.

AI responses can change frequently. Run periodic analyses to track how your visibility evolves over time.

Yes! Enter any query to see which domains appear. Compare your brand against competitors to identify gaps.

What’s the difference between this and traditional rank tracking?

Section titled “What’s the difference between this and traditional rank tracking?”

Traditional rank tracking only shows organic SERP positions. AIRS shows where sources appear in AI-generated answers—an increasingly important visibility metric.

AIRS uses a single bundle cost covering all 11 surfaces in one analysis: 9 AI engines plus Google and Bing SERPs. The exact cost depends on your AI model selection, and credits are only deducted when the analysis completes successfully.

What is the difference between being named and being cited?

Section titled “What is the difference between being named and being cited?”

Being named means an engine wrote your brand into its answer. Being cited means it used one of your pages as a source without necessarily naming you. Engines regularly do the second without the first, which is why AIRS reports them separately. See Brand Mentions and Citations.

What is the difference between stance and sentiment?

Section titled “What is the difference between stance and sentiment?”

Stance is how the answer positions an entity: recommended, conditionally recommended, compared against others, mentioned in passing, cited as an authority, or criticized. Sentiment is the tone toward it. An engine can describe you positively while recommending someone else, so the two are reported separately and neither is inferred from how often you are mentioned.

Why does an entity’s engine count look low?

Section titled “Why does an entity’s engine count look low?”

Counts are stated against responding AI engines only, and each entity is counted from the answer text. If an engine failed on this run, it is not in the denominator. If an engine cited your page but never wrote your name, that is a citation, not a mention, and it appears in the Source Comparison view rather than the entity count.

Why does a URL show a high AI Citations count but no SERP position, or the reverse?

Section titled “Why does a URL show a high AI Citations count but no SERP position, or the reverse?”

They measure different things and AIRS never merges them. AI Citations counts the AI engines that quoted a URL as a source. Organic search presence is whether it ranked on Google or Bing. A page can be quoted by six AI engines without ranking at all, and a top-three ranking page can go unquoted. The gap between the two columns is usually the most useful thing on the table.